Studies on Butterfly Diversity (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) from Punjab Agricultural University Campus, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Authors

  • P. C. Pathania
     Zoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata - 700053, West Bengal
  • H. K. Mangat
     Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana – 141004, Punjab
  • A. K. Sidhu
     High Altitude Regional Station, Zoological Survey of India, Saproon, Solan - 173 211, Himachal Pradesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v118/i1/2018/121626

Keywords:

Butterfly, Diversity, Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea.

Abstract

Thirty-three species referable to twenty-four genera belonging to five families, namely, Hesperiidae (1), Lycaenidae (6), Nymphalidae (14), Papilionidae (3) and Pieridae (9) from different localities of University campus were collected and identified. The details on their synonymy, material examined, and host distribution along with plants are provided. The photographs of the adults are also given.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

P. C. Pathania, Zoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata - 700053, West Bengal

Scientist D, Lepidoptera Section

Downloads

Published

2018-05-10

How to Cite

Pathania, P. C., Mangat, H. K., & Sidhu, A. K. (2018). Studies on Butterfly Diversity (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) from Punjab Agricultural University Campus, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, 118(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v118/i1/2018/121626

Issue

Volume 118, Issue 1, 2018

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Ambrose, D.P. and Raj, D.S. 2005. Butterflies of Kalakad-Mundanthurai tiger reserve, Tamil Nadu. Zoos’ Print Journal, 20: 2100-07.

Anonymous. 2017. Neptis soma Moore, 1858-Creamy Sailer. Kunte, K., P. Roy, S. Kalesh and U. Kodandaramaiah (eds.). Butterflies of India, v. 2.24. Indian Foundation for Butterflies.

Bingham, C.T. 1905. The Fauna of British India. Butterflies vol. VI. Taylor and Francis Red lion court, fleet street, London. pp. 11-413.

Bingham, C.T. 1907. The Fauna of British India. Butterflies vol. II. Taylor and Francis Red lion court, fleet street, London. pp. 219-222.

Chandrasekharan, V.K. 2017. Pelopidas mathias Fabricius, 1798 – Small Branded Swift. Kunte, K., P. Roy, S. Kalesh and U. Kodandaramaiah (eds.). Butterflies of India, v. 2.24. Indian Foundation for Butterflies.

Common, I.F.B. 1970. Lepidoptera (Moths and butterflies), in the insect of Australia. 1-866, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.

Daily, G.C. 1997. Introduction: What are ecosystem services? Pages 1-10 in G. Daily, editor. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

Talbot, G. 1939. The fauna of British India. Butterfly vol. I Taylor and Francis Red lion court, fleet street, London. P. 184-414.

Gaonkar, H. 1996. Butterflies of Western Ghats with notes on those of Sri Lanka. A report of Center of Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of science, Bangalore, Zoological Museum, Copenhagen and Natural History Museum, London.

Ghazoul, J. 2002. Impact of logging on the richness and diversity of forest butterflies in a tropical dry forest in Thailand. Biodivers. Conserv. 11: 521–541.

Haribal, M. 1992.The Butterflies of Sikkim Himalaya and their Natural History. Published by Sikkim Nature Conservation Foundation (SNCF), Gangtok, Sikkim, 217pp.

Heppner, J. 1998. Classification of Lepidoptera. Part I Introduction. Holarctic Lepidoptera 5: 148.

Javed, I. 1978. Preliminary report of butterflies of district Rawalpindi and Islamabad. Biologia, 24(2): 238–247.

Khan, M.R., Nasim, M., Khan, M.R. and Rafi, M.A. 2004. Diversity of butterflies from district Muzaffarabad, Azad Kashmir. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7(3): 324–327.

Kirby, W.F. 1872. On the geographical distribution of the diurnal Lepidoptera as compared with that of the birds. J. Linn. Soc. Lond., Zoo. 11:431–439.

Kumar, P. 2008. Handbook on Common Butterflies of Uttarakhand. Zool. Surv. India. 1–136.

Kunte, K. 2000. Butterflies of Peninsular India. Universities Press (Hyderabad) and Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore. 270pp.

Kunte, K. 2006. Additions to the known larval host plants of Indian Butterflies. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society. 103(1): 119–122.

Kunte, K. and Soman, A. 2017. Pieris brassicae Linnaeus, 1758 – Large Cabbage White. Kunte, K., P. Roy, S. Kalesh and U. Kodandaramaiah (eds.). Butterflies of India, v. 2.24. Indian Foundation for Butterflies.

Landing, B.H. 1984. Factors in the distribution of butterfly color and behavior patterns-Selected aspects. Privately published, Los Angeles. 200 pp.

Mal, B., Memon, N., Shah, M.A. and Shah, N.A. 2013. Re description and New Record of Small Arab Group of Genus Colitis (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan. Sindh Univ. Res. Jour. (Sci. Ser.), 45(2): 357–364.

Rafi, M.A., Matin, M.A., Sheikh, M.K. and Ashfaque, M. 2000. Papilionid (swallowtails) butterflies of Pakistan. Gul Awan Printers, Islamabad, Pakistan, 2: 1–33.

Rose, H.S. and Walia, V.K. 2003. Inventory of the Butterflies diversity of Chandigarh. Bionotes, 5(3): 58-60.

Saji, K. and Manoj, P. 2017. Telicota bambusae Moore, 1878- Dark Palm-Dart. Kunte, K., P. Roy, S. Kalesh and U. Kodandaramaiah (eds.). Butterflies of India, v. 2.24. Indian Foundation for Butterflies

Saji, K.A., Soman and Karmakar, T. 2017. Melanitis leda Linnaeus, 1758 – Common Evening Brown. Kunte, K., P. Roy, S. Kalesh and U. Kodandaramaiah (eds.). Butterflies of India, v. 2.24. Indian Foundation for Butterflies.

Suwarno. 2010. Population dynamic of the swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polytes (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in dry and wet seasons. Biodiversitas, 11(1): 19–23.

Wilson, E. 1997. Introduction.In Reakakudla ML, Wilson DE, Wilson EO, editors. Biodiversity II. Washington DC. Henry Press., 1-3.

Steve, W. 2005. Field Guide to Butterflies of South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: Struik. ISBN 978-1-86872-724-7.

Zimmerman, E.C. 1978. Microlepidoptera. Ins. Hawaii, Vol. 9. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, 18: 1–1903.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>